Monday, 22 March, 2010 6:13 AM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: corporate property, current price, hesta super, richard wallace, watts,
 

Wrap time

By Julia Newbould
Mon 03 Sep 2007

While conflict of interest has stopped advisers receiving more by referring one product over another, volume bonuses continue to exist and are typically distributed in a more equitable way between dealer group and adviser.


Just less than a month away from IFA's seventh annual Masterfunds, Wraps and Platforms Conference, I have been pondering what has changed in the wrap space.

Since Asgard was launched by Sealcorp, now almost 20 years ago, what has changed? The advisers or distribution arms of financial services firms have seen their parts of the pie increase while the fund managers have faced a squeeze of sorts.

Sealcorp was the first to use the volume bonus structure now so common with wrap provision. After the big $272 million sale to St George in 1997, the company was faced with a group of eight advisers who were upset that they didn't get a part of the money.

They argued that it was their clients' money that allowed Sealcorp to achieve such a high sale price. After threatening to leave and take the money with them, they were given what is now known as volume bonuses. The master trust certainly used its distribution to build funds under management and rewarded its users for such.

While conflict of interest has stopped advisers receiving more by referring one product over another, volume bonuses continue to exist and are typically distributed in a more equitable way between dealer group and adviser. Yet, it is rare for the consumer to feel the real benefit of the rebates.

However, it may be argued that wraps have enabled advisers to spend more time with clients, giving them advice and focusing on their portfolios. It has also allowed them to use a wider range of products for clients.

In other news this week, the FPA has been given a rap by its members. Almost three-fifths of its members believe it has changed for the better, with nine out of 10 areas showing signs of improvement in terms of FPA performance, the exception being the promotion of the certified financial planner designation.

Go to today's InvestorDaily news

More stories by this author


 

Latest videos

VIDEO: No choice for insurance - Tower

Tower's Jim Minto explains why the insurer opposes further consolidation, especially if it reduces the choice of insurance products on a platform.... Watch»

VIDEO: China - the year of the bubble?

It's the year of the tiger, but also one in which observers are looking closely at China's economy for signs of a bubble.... Watch»

VIDEO: Fear and volatility in the market

Pengana's John McGuinness talks about the impact of recent market jitters on the closely watched S&P 500 Volatility Index.... Watch»

Christine St Anne

Too big to fail

There is a seminal moment in Andrew Ross Sorkin's book, Too Big to Fail, when the short-selling ban is met with market euphoria. ... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

BUSS(Q) adds $40m to private equity »
After holding back from investing in private equity, BUSS(Q) tests the waters with two new mandates.

RBC Dexia nabs Omega custody mandate »
The global custodian will provide custody services to the boutique firm.

Kate Kachor

The change we had to have

The proposed regulatory moves across Australia's financial advisory sector that promise a wind of changed professionalism may also help double the number of people seeking financial advice, industry research has claimed.... read more »

 

 
© Copyright 2009 Morningstar Australasia Pty Limited · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot