Friday, 21 November, 2008 5:03 AM AEST


log in / free register · change details · about · contact · subscribe · newsletter · advertise · mobile recent searches: process, mcp, collapses, bernstein, financial planning,
 

Total control

Julia Newbould
By Julia Newbould
Mon 28 Jul 2008

Out and about last week, I heard an interesting theory on how to eliminate the numerous conflicts of interest many dealer groups have: get rid of dealer groups and in their place let financial planners be independently licensed.


Out and about last week, I heard an interesting theory on how to eliminate the numerous conflicts of interest many dealer groups have: get rid of dealer groups and in their place let financial planners be independently licensed.

It was an unpopular idea, but perhaps not one without merit.

Running a dealer group is expensive. Most are being subsidised by fund managers through platforms, rebates and other 'conflicted' means.

However, for the regulator to pick up the administration of 15,000 planners is probably not going to appeal.

The Australian Taxation Office is already struggling with the number of self-managed super funds (SMSF) it has to administer and this would be a similar logistical nightmare, albeit for a different regulator.

It would transform the financial services landscape in an interesting way.

While eliminating dealer groups would remove some conflicts of interest and, according to research, may make more people trust financial planners and seek advice, the reality would be different.

Currently, the big dealer groups offer some sort of safety net for investors and financial planning clients.

Without the backing of the big boys, such as Westpac, Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Colonial First Stat, maybe clients wouldn't feel as secure placing investments through smaller, independent planners.

The cost of advice is likely to increase greatly and that will put it out of the reach of many potential clients.

However, it was an interesting thought to ponder and with the proliferation of SMSFs and trustees being more used to dealing with accountants and their regulatory system, perhaps some people would be equally comfortable with advisers who hold similar licences.

Perhaps it will take the new generation of advisers to want a change to the system - those who do not want their licences to be held through a dealer group, which is only as reputable as its least reputable member.

Go to today's news

More stories by this author


 

InvestorDaily video:

Hot seat

Hot Seat... Part 2

In Part 2 of our exclusive series, we ask leading names to nominate their best investments, the most effective industry group and the importance of platforms.

InvestorDaily video:


Masterfunds Conference

When will the market recover?

Find out who's hot, who's not and who's predicting a quick recovery amongst the highlights of  The 8th Annual Wraps, Platforms & Masterfunds Conference

Christine St Anne

Life goes on despite meltdown

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown last month uttered the 'R' word. Brown told parliament Britain will "most likely" head towards a recession. A view also shared by the country's central bank chief. ... read more »

Home delivered!

Daily news, weekday mornings

Get the day's news delivered direct to your inbox. Register here (it's free!) and choose 'yes' to receive the InvestorDaily newsletter.

Money on the move

Catholics revamp fixed interest »
Industry superannuation fund the Catholic Superannuation and Retirement Fund (CSRF) has revamped its fixed income portfolio.

Mercer backs alternatives »
Mercer has awarded $34.15 million in mandates to Tactical Global Management (TGM) and Lazard Asset Management to invest in alternative assets.

Julia Newbould

Dancing in the street

On the anniversary of the infamous Gunpowder Plot and also marks the occasion the supposedly most powerful nation in the world has elected its first black president. ... read more »

 

 
©2008 InvestorInfo Pty Ltd · legal · privacy policy · linking to us · community · powered by RedDot